Social Impact of AV Media Symposium

We are living in a time of severe social injustices, political clashes and ecological crises. In this situation many films, videos and TV programmes are produced with the intention of creating “social impact” that improves the status quo. These productions include fictional movies with messages, “social impact entertainment”, “entertainment-education” programmes on TV, fundraising spots, health intervention films, activist videos, political art films, workers’ films, or participatory films on social issues. But what actually is positive impact, and how can it be achieved? What types and forms of films have a great impact? And how can we create and disseminate such films?

Co-organised by Jens Eder (Konrad Wolf Film University of Babelsberg), Catalin Brylla (Centre for the Study of Conflict, Emotion and Social Justice, Bournemouth University) and Tobias Gralke, the 2021 Social Impact of AV Media Symposium aimed to map the scope of research-led audiovisual media practice in terms of social justice and environmental concerns. The purpose was to create an interdisciplinary awareness that encourages stakeholders to consider the reach and significance of audiovisual media for addressing social and environmental concerns in line with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. This purpose hinges on two key areas: research-led practice and practice-led research. Research-led practice involves the research and conceptualisation of strategies and methodologies with the specific aim of producing media artefacts that generate impact. We consider such endeavours to be situated in a range of contexts, such as the academy, the media industry, social care, medical care, community welfare, activist movements and marketing campaigns. This area explores the deployment of different impact models and approaches during media production (e.g. through participatory techniques), as well as beyond production and exhibition. It also studies policies, reports, guidelines and toolkits aimed at informing the research around media practice.

Practice-led research addresses methodologies that measure the impact, or pathways for impact, of media practice in general, whether that practice aims for impact or not. These can include a wide range of social science approaches (e.g. audience research, policy research and discourse analysis), and it can be located in the same variety of contexts as the ones informing media practice itself. This area also addresses how impact can be classified along different dimensions, such as scale (micro, meso, macro), temporality (long/short-term), ethics, audience engagement and behavioural effort.

Programme

Introduction

General Approaches to Impact

Catalin Brylla, Jens Eder and Tobias Gralke

Conceptualisations of Impact

Social Impact – What, Why and How

Bettina Kurz

A Maker-inclusive Understanding of Impact

Frédéric Dubois

Impact Strategies

Pandemic Effects on Media Impact Campaigns

Patricia Finneran

The Documentary Commons as Political Action – Establishing Critical and Ethical Impact Assessment

Angela Aguayo

Strategies and Ethics of Impact

Interim summary

John Corner

Video for Change

Political Campaign Videos and the Pedagogy of Impact

David Knight

Non-Fictional Forms and Impact

Village Tales: Creative Practice and the Challenges of Evidencing Impact

Sue Sudbury

Channel 4 and the Paralympics – How a UK Broadcaster is Reframing Disability

Dan Jackson

Fictional Forms of Impact

Narrative Strategies for Animated Development Communication – Examples from BRAC in Bangladesh

Naima Alam

Scripting and Filming in Paintbrush – Exploring the Identity of Black, Teenage and Female in a Nigerian Diaspora Community of Peckham in London

Samantha Iwowo

From the Middle of Society – The Audience is More Mature than Some Decision Makers Think

Peter Hartwig

Questions and Challenges of Impact

Closing Discussion
Symposium Report

Tobias Gralke

Links

Impact Guidelines for Practitioners

Eder, J. 2022 (forthcoming). Political Impact: On the Societal Vibrancy of Film. In: What Film Is Good For: Varieties of Ethical Experience in Cinematic Spectatorship, edited by Julian Hanich und Martin P. Rossouw. Berkeley: University of California Press.